ok

Mini Shell

Direktori : /opt/alt/postgresql11/usr/share/doc/alt-postgresql11-9.2.24/html/
Upload File :
Current File : //opt/alt/postgresql11/usr/share/doc/alt-postgresql11-9.2.24/html/querytree.html

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
<HTML
><HEAD
><TITLE
>The Query Tree</TITLE
><META
NAME="GENERATOR"
CONTENT="Modular DocBook HTML Stylesheet Version 1.79"><LINK
REV="MADE"
HREF="mailto:pgsql-docs@postgresql.org"><LINK
REL="HOME"
TITLE="PostgreSQL 9.2.24 Documentation"
HREF="index.html"><LINK
REL="UP"
TITLE="The Rule System"
HREF="rules.html"><LINK
REL="PREVIOUS"
TITLE="The Rule System"
HREF="rules.html"><LINK
REL="NEXT"
TITLE="Views and the Rule System"
HREF="rules-views.html"><LINK
REL="STYLESHEET"
TYPE="text/css"
HREF="stylesheet.css"><META
HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type"
CONTENT="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"><META
NAME="creation"
CONTENT="2017-11-06T22:43:11"></HEAD
><BODY
CLASS="SECT1"
><DIV
CLASS="NAVHEADER"
><TABLE
SUMMARY="Header navigation table"
WIDTH="100%"
BORDER="0"
CELLPADDING="0"
CELLSPACING="0"
><TR
><TH
COLSPAN="5"
ALIGN="center"
VALIGN="bottom"
><A
HREF="index.html"
>PostgreSQL 9.2.24 Documentation</A
></TH
></TR
><TR
><TD
WIDTH="10%"
ALIGN="left"
VALIGN="top"
><A
TITLE="The Rule System"
HREF="rules.html"
ACCESSKEY="P"
>Prev</A
></TD
><TD
WIDTH="10%"
ALIGN="left"
VALIGN="top"
><A
HREF="rules.html"
ACCESSKEY="U"
>Up</A
></TD
><TD
WIDTH="60%"
ALIGN="center"
VALIGN="bottom"
>Chapter 37. The Rule System</TD
><TD
WIDTH="20%"
ALIGN="right"
VALIGN="top"
><A
TITLE="Views and the Rule System"
HREF="rules-views.html"
ACCESSKEY="N"
>Next</A
></TD
></TR
></TABLE
><HR
ALIGN="LEFT"
WIDTH="100%"></DIV
><DIV
CLASS="SECT1"
><H1
CLASS="SECT1"
><A
NAME="QUERYTREE"
>37.1. The Query Tree</A
></H1
><P
>    To understand how the rule system works it is necessary to know
    when it is invoked and what its input and results are.</P
><P
>    The rule system is located between the parser and the planner.
    It takes the output of the parser, one query tree, and the user-defined
    rewrite rules, which are also
    query trees with some extra information, and creates zero or more
    query trees as result. So its input and output are always things
    the parser itself could have produced and thus, anything it sees
    is basically representable as an <ACRONYM
CLASS="ACRONYM"
>SQL</ACRONYM
> statement.</P
><P
>    Now what is a query tree? It is an internal representation of an
    <ACRONYM
CLASS="ACRONYM"
>SQL</ACRONYM
> statement where the single parts that it is
    built from are stored separately. These query trees can be shown
    in the server log if you set the configuration parameters
    <TT
CLASS="VARNAME"
>debug_print_parse</TT
>,
    <TT
CLASS="VARNAME"
>debug_print_rewritten</TT
>, or
    <TT
CLASS="VARNAME"
>debug_print_plan</TT
>.  The rule actions are also
    stored as query trees, in the system catalog
    <TT
CLASS="STRUCTNAME"
>pg_rewrite</TT
>.  They are not formatted like
    the log output, but they contain exactly the same information.</P
><P
>    Reading a raw query tree requires some experience.  But since
    <ACRONYM
CLASS="ACRONYM"
>SQL</ACRONYM
> representations of query trees are
    sufficient to understand the rule system, this chapter will not
    teach how to read them.</P
><P
>    When reading the <ACRONYM
CLASS="ACRONYM"
>SQL</ACRONYM
> representations of the
    query trees in this chapter it is necessary to be able to identify
    the parts the statement is broken into when it is in the query tree
    structure. The parts of a query tree are

<P
></P
></P><DIV
CLASS="VARIABLELIST"
><DL
><DT
>the command type</DT
><DD
><P
>        This is a simple value telling which command
        (<TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>SELECT</TT
>, <TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>INSERT</TT
>,
        <TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>UPDATE</TT
>, <TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>DELETE</TT
>) produced
        the query tree.
    </P
></DD
><DT
>the range table</DT
><DD
><P
>        The range table is a list of relations that are used in the query.
        In a <TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>SELECT</TT
> statement these are the relations given after
        the <TT
CLASS="LITERAL"
>FROM</TT
> key word.
    </P
><P
>        Every range table entry identifies a table or view and tells
        by which name it is called in the other parts of the query.
        In the query tree, the range table entries are referenced by
        number rather than by name, so here it doesn't matter if there
        are duplicate names as it would in an <ACRONYM
CLASS="ACRONYM"
>SQL</ACRONYM
>
        statement. This can happen after the range tables of rules
        have been merged in. The examples in this chapter will not have
        this situation.
    </P
></DD
><DT
>the result relation</DT
><DD
><P
>        This is an index into the range table that identifies the
        relation where the results of the query go.
    </P
><P
>        <TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>SELECT</TT
> queries don't have a result
        relation. (The special case of <TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>SELECT INTO</TT
> is
        mostly identical to <TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>CREATE TABLE</TT
> followed by
        <TT
CLASS="LITERAL"
>INSERT ... SELECT</TT
>, and is not discussed
        separately here.)
    </P
><P
>        For <TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>INSERT</TT
>, <TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>UPDATE</TT
>, and
        <TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>DELETE</TT
> commands, the result relation is the table
        (or view!) where the changes are to take effect.
    </P
></DD
><DT
>the target list</DT
><DD
><P
>        The target list is a list of expressions that define the
        result of the query.  In the case of a
        <TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>SELECT</TT
>, these expressions are the ones that
        build the final output of the query.  They correspond to the
        expressions between the key words <TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>SELECT</TT
>
        and <TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>FROM</TT
>.  (<TT
CLASS="LITERAL"
>*</TT
> is just an
        abbreviation for all the column names of a relation.  It is
        expanded by the parser into the individual columns, so the
        rule system never sees it.)
    </P
><P
>        <TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>DELETE</TT
> commands don't need a normal target list
        because they don't produce any result.  Instead, the rule system
        adds a special <ACRONYM
CLASS="ACRONYM"
>CTID</ACRONYM
> entry to the empty target list,
        to allow the executor to find the row to be deleted.
        (<ACRONYM
CLASS="ACRONYM"
>CTID</ACRONYM
> is added when the result relation is an ordinary
        table.  If it is a view, a whole-row variable is added instead,
        as described in <A
HREF="rules-views.html#RULES-VIEWS-UPDATE"
>Section 37.2.4</A
>.)
    </P
><P
>        For <TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>INSERT</TT
> commands, the target list describes
        the new rows that should go into the result relation. It consists of the
        expressions in the <TT
CLASS="LITERAL"
>VALUES</TT
> clause or the ones from the
        <TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>SELECT</TT
> clause in <TT
CLASS="LITERAL"
>INSERT
        ... SELECT</TT
>.  The first step of the rewrite process adds
        target list entries for any columns that were not assigned to by
        the original command but have defaults.  Any remaining columns (with
        neither a given value nor a default) will be filled in by the
        planner with a constant null expression.
    </P
><P
>        For <TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>UPDATE</TT
> commands, the target list
        describes the new rows that should replace the old ones. In the
        rule system, it contains just the expressions from the <TT
CLASS="LITERAL"
>SET
        column = expression</TT
> part of the command.  The planner will
        handle missing columns by inserting expressions that copy the values
        from the old row into the new one.  Just as for <TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>DELETE</TT
>,
        the rule system adds a <ACRONYM
CLASS="ACRONYM"
>CTID</ACRONYM
> or whole-row variable so that
        the executor can identify the old row to be updated.
    </P
><P
>        Every entry in the target list contains an expression that can
        be a constant value, a variable pointing to a column of one
        of the relations in the range table, a parameter, or an expression
        tree made of function calls, constants, variables, operators, etc.
    </P
></DD
><DT
>the qualification</DT
><DD
><P
>        The query's qualification is an expression much like one of
        those contained in the target list entries. The result value of
        this expression is a Boolean that tells whether the operation
        (<TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>INSERT</TT
>, <TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>UPDATE</TT
>,
        <TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>DELETE</TT
>, or <TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>SELECT</TT
>) for the
        final result row should be executed or not. It corresponds to the <TT
CLASS="LITERAL"
>WHERE</TT
> clause
        of an <ACRONYM
CLASS="ACRONYM"
>SQL</ACRONYM
> statement.
    </P
></DD
><DT
>the join tree</DT
><DD
><P
>        The query's join tree shows the structure of the <TT
CLASS="LITERAL"
>FROM</TT
> clause.
        For a simple query like <TT
CLASS="LITERAL"
>SELECT ... FROM a, b, c</TT
>, the join tree is just
        a list of the <TT
CLASS="LITERAL"
>FROM</TT
> items, because we are allowed to join them in
        any order.  But when <TT
CLASS="LITERAL"
>JOIN</TT
> expressions, particularly outer joins,
        are used, we have to join in the order shown by the joins.
        In that case, the join tree shows the structure of the <TT
CLASS="LITERAL"
>JOIN</TT
> expressions.  The
        restrictions associated with particular <TT
CLASS="LITERAL"
>JOIN</TT
> clauses (from <TT
CLASS="LITERAL"
>ON</TT
> or
        <TT
CLASS="LITERAL"
>USING</TT
> expressions) are stored as qualification expressions attached
        to those join-tree nodes.  It turns out to be convenient to store
        the top-level <TT
CLASS="LITERAL"
>WHERE</TT
> expression as a qualification attached to the
        top-level join-tree item, too.  So really the join tree represents
        both the <TT
CLASS="LITERAL"
>FROM</TT
> and <TT
CLASS="LITERAL"
>WHERE</TT
> clauses of a <TT
CLASS="COMMAND"
>SELECT</TT
>.
    </P
></DD
><DT
>the others</DT
><DD
><P
>        The other parts of the query tree like the <TT
CLASS="LITERAL"
>ORDER BY</TT
>
        clause aren't of interest here. The rule system
        substitutes some entries there while applying rules, but that
        doesn't have much to do with the fundamentals of the rule
        system.
    </P
></DD
></DL
></DIV
><P></P
></DIV
><DIV
CLASS="NAVFOOTER"
><HR
ALIGN="LEFT"
WIDTH="100%"><TABLE
SUMMARY="Footer navigation table"
WIDTH="100%"
BORDER="0"
CELLPADDING="0"
CELLSPACING="0"
><TR
><TD
WIDTH="33%"
ALIGN="left"
VALIGN="top"
><A
HREF="rules.html"
ACCESSKEY="P"
>Prev</A
></TD
><TD
WIDTH="34%"
ALIGN="center"
VALIGN="top"
><A
HREF="index.html"
ACCESSKEY="H"
>Home</A
></TD
><TD
WIDTH="33%"
ALIGN="right"
VALIGN="top"
><A
HREF="rules-views.html"
ACCESSKEY="N"
>Next</A
></TD
></TR
><TR
><TD
WIDTH="33%"
ALIGN="left"
VALIGN="top"
>The Rule System</TD
><TD
WIDTH="34%"
ALIGN="center"
VALIGN="top"
><A
HREF="rules.html"
ACCESSKEY="U"
>Up</A
></TD
><TD
WIDTH="33%"
ALIGN="right"
VALIGN="top"
>Views and the Rule System</TD
></TR
></TABLE
></DIV
></BODY
></HTML
>

Zerion Mini Shell 1.0